Use of a double spring versus a single spring for single-point radiator suspension.
| Identifier | ExFiles\Box 15\1\ Scan273 | |
| Date | 7th May 1930 | |
| x7250. EV. {Ivan Evernden - coachwork} from Da. {Bernard Day - Chassis Design} c. Sg. {Arthur F. Sidgreaves - MD} Hs. {Lord Ernest Hives - Chair} Dal/M7.5.30. SINGLE POINT RADIATOR SUSPENSION. X.7250 X.5250. We send herewith N.sch.3083, in which it is suggested that we should use a double spring in the suspension to obtain the rather peculiar rating which the experiment seemed to ask for. The addition of the second spring does not appear to amount to very much as regards cost or complication. With a single spring it seems nearly impossible to get a rating which will maintain contact all the time, and yet reach the high load required at the extreme limit of the oscillation. Da. {Bernard Day - Chassis Design} | ||
From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).