Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

Use of Rolled versus Solid Eyes on axle springs for various chassis models.


Identifier  ExFiles\Box 52\2\  Scan293
Date  12th November 1932
  
To BY from ROY. {Mr H. Royce - Buyer}
c. to Hs. {Lord Ernest Hives - Chair}

X4479.

ROY {Mr H. Royce - Buyer} 3/MG12.11.32

Axle Springs

I gather we are all in agreement that the use of Rolled Eyes on our 20 HP. and 40/50 HP. Chassis Axle Springs is satisfactory. The 20 HP. Springs with Rolled Eyes we have been using for many years, and I understand with every satisfaction; but so far, due to restriction in output, we have carried on with Solid Eyes in the case of 40/50 HP. Chassis Springs.

Presumably we are quite safe in substituting Rolled Eyes on the latter in due course, but on this point kindly confirm. It makes quite a substantial difference in the purchase price.

Arising therefrom, Messrs. Firth draw our attention to the fact that the outside diameter of such Rolled Eyes on our 40/50 HP. Chassis is greater than that of the Solid, and ask whether the Rolled Eyes as shown will be suitable for our various shackles, Drawing NO.71 attached.

ROY {Mr H. Royce - Buyer}

ENCLOSURE. to BY

RECEIVED
LONDON
NOV 14
  
  
From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).


Copyright Sustain 2026, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙