Error with dynamo brushes supplied with unwanted coppering and asking if they should be returned for correction.
| Identifier | ExFiles\Box 50\5\ Scan237 | |
| Date | 8th October 1923 | |
| X4333 To EFC. {E. Fowler Clarke - Electrical Engineer} BY {R.W. Bailey - Chief Engineer} /Ds2/AL8.10.23. X 4333. RE DYNAMO BRUSHES. Referring to your EFC {E. Fowler Clarke - Electrical Engineer} 7/T5.10.23., the E.A.C. Brushes were ordered before the Note - "No coppering required" was added. The 20. H.P. Brush drawings had the note on when ordered and it is Morgans' error, no doubt because coppering is generally standard and they are not accustomed to supplying Brushes to us without it on. Do you think it is necessary to return the brushes to Morgans for correction? BY {R.W. Bailey - Chief Engineer} /Ds. [Signature] | ||
From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).