Proposal for an experimental comparison between parallel and slightly spiral teeth, following the development of a longitudinal damper.
| Identifier | WestWitteringFiles\T\2January1929-June1929\ Scan181 | |
| Date | 22th March 1929 | |
| R. {Sir Henry Royce} from EFC. {E. Fowler Clarke - Electrical Engineer} SG. {Arthur F. Sidgreaves - MD} Wor. {Arthur Wormald - General Works Manager} E. {Mr Elliott - Chief Engineer} By. {R.W. Bailey - Chief Engineer} ORIGINAL FC2/T22.3.29. SEQUENCE STARTER. X625 Further to our EFCL/T20.3.29, it was our intention therein to refer to the question of parallel teeth versus slightly spiral teeth ( 5° or 10°). Now that we have the longitudinal damper it is suggested that an experimental comparison should be made between an up-to-date system (as now instructed for production) and a similar system with slightly spiral teeth. We think it is now a case where we cannot very certainly predict comparative performance, but that there may be advantages in a 5° or 10° spiral. EFC. {E. Fowler Clarke - Electrical Engineer} | ||
From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).