Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

Customer feedback on the inconvenience of the oil emptying arrangement and the non-attached petrol tank cap on new 20 HP cars.


Identifier  ExFiles\Box 47\5\  Scan190
Date  1st October 1928
  
XL4118
PN. {Mr Northey} 1/WTL.10.28.

1/S
S/W. {Sales / Derby Works}
Wor. {Arthur Wormald - General Works Manager} ..from PN. {Mr Northey}
Copy to Hs. {Lord Ernest Hives - Chair}
Sg. {Arthur F. Sidgreaves - MD}
OMB.

Mt. Sidney of Hampstead who has long been an enthusiastic owner of Rolls-Royce cars when writing recently a most appreciative letter in respect of two new 20 H.P. Rolls-Royce cars he had bought, said there were two small details which were the cause of considerable irritation to him as an owner-driver.

1. Was that the arrangement for emptying the oil from the crank case now entailed the use of a split-pin and nut which were highly inconvenient - and -

2. The petrol tank cap was in no way attached as previously, to the tank, and he found that there was a distinct tendency to omit to fit the cap on to the tank after filling up with petrol.

I promised to let him know whether we had any sound reason for making these changes from the previous type. Will you please let me have your remarks.

PN. {Mr Northey}

[signature]
  
  
From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).


Copyright Sustain 2026, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙