Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

Report comparing the exhaust noise of unit 19-EX after fitting a stronger downtake pipe and expansion box against unit 60.JS.


Identifier  ExFiles\Box 11\4\  04-page106
Date  16th July 1932
  
x7941.

To Hs {Lord Ernest Hives - Chair} /Rm. {William Robotham - Chief Engineer}
From G.W.H.

Hotel de France,
Chateauroux(French test region),
FRANCE.

16.7.32.

19-EX.

We fitted the stronger downtake pipe, front expansion box, and intermediate pipe. The respective gauge being 8 SWG, 8 SWG & 12 SWG.

We have not been able to appreciate any difference in the exhaust noise with the fitting of these units.

We have compared the exhaust noise of 19-EX as against 60.JS. {Mr Johnson's Secretary}

The tinniness of 19-EX at the front expansion box is 20% more pronounced than 60.JS. {Mr Johnson's Secretary} The exhaust beat is the worst feature.

The snout noise, 19-EX is 10% more.

G.W.H.
  
  
From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).


Copyright Sustain 2026, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙