Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

Design of car bodies, advocating against heavy and cramped designs and praising a new Windovers scheme.


Identifier  ExFiles\Box 5\2\  02-page023
Date  27th October 1925
  
To C.J. from R. {Sir Henry Royce}
c. to C.J. DA. {Bernard Day - Chassis Design}
c. to BY. {R.W. Bailey - Chief Engineer} Hs. {Lord Ernest Hives - Chair}
c. to L.H.S. C.

X5830

R3/M27.10.25.

RE. BODIES. X.8830 X.5830

I am sometimes misunderstood on the question of bodies. I cannot say that I am a good critic of what ought to be made, but I do think we should use every endeavour to avoid very heavy, and especially top heavy bodies.

I do not like cramped bodies for our 40/50, or even for our 20 HP., especially in the matter of width at the front seat, and I do dislike the practice of waste of space and weight, as I have seen many times even lately.

I am not blaming RR. for these shortcomings, but I think we ought to use our influence to keep them as near right as possible.

Windovers have fitted to the India(Production 20 HP. with 4-speed box and Front Wheel Brakes) a simple scheme of running-board tool box, light, inexpensive, and efficient, and vastly different to some I complained of some months ago which were heavy, and putrid with fungus.

R. {Sir Henry Royce}
  
  
From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).


Copyright Sustain 2026, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙