Clarifying that shock absorbers are cancelled for rear springs, not brakes, and that springs should be assembled dry.
| Identifier | ExFiles\Box 3\1\ 01-page192 | |
| Date | 11th April 1913 | |
| AW/EMG/L11413 Springs [handwritten] Re Shock Absorbers on Rear Brakes [strikethrough] Springs [handwritten] - X.189 Mr Nadin 11-4-13 Kindly note that Mr Royce in his memo R8/B7413, which you have, recommends that shock absorbers be can- celled for rear brakes [strikethrough] Springs [handwritten]. Mr Wormald and Mr Nadin also agree and Mr Platford remarks :- "I suggest the above should be done "in combination with rear springs which "are put together dry [underlined] - should not be "greased." p. A. {Mr Adams} Wormald. | ||
From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).