Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).
Test report on a Phantom II with a Barker coachbuilt body, detailing engine issues, excellent brakes, and a dangerously flexible chassis.

Identifier  ExFiles\Box 65a\3\  scan0186
Date  28th December 1929 guessed
  
COPY.

ROLLS-ROYCE CLOSE-COUPLED "PHANTOM II" FITTED WITH
A BARKER FOUR-LIGHT COACHBUILT BODY.
-----------------------------------------

ENGINE.

There seems to be a serious crankshaft period at about
52 or 57 m.p.h. This is so distinctly noticeable that it can
be felt by the passenger in the front seat through the floor-boards
if the car is travelling fast for any lengthy period.
Plug trouble is experienced or, at any rate, plug trouble
was experienced on this particular car due to pre-ignition, and
the car is being returned with a pronounced intermittent miss at
low speeds on acceleration.

BRAKES.

These are without question the finest brakes the writer
has ever had the experience of testing. The compensation seems
to be almost perfect, and they are a distinct advance on the Hispano
system which is the best the writer has hitherto tried.

CHASSIS.

The front portion of the chassis is distinctly too flexible
and when going fast over rough roads the radiator jiggles about
in the most alarming manner. On this particular car I estimate
that the radiator mascot moved fully 2 inches from the centre in
either direction. The result is that the car is apt to be danger-
ous when cornering fast due to wheel bounce and undue flexibility
in front. If it is intended in the future to produce a fast
chassis, it is the writer's opinion that it will be found absolutely
necessary to strengthen up the front end of the chassis, because in
travelling fast the first essential is that the front half of the
car must be rigid. This can usually be obtained by tightening up
the shock-absorbers of the front springs much more than the back,
but I consider that even if this were done on this particular car,
the chassis itself would still be far too flexible.
It is never necessary when preparing a car for fast touring
to bother very much about the back springs. These have no bearing
on the car's qualities for rapid cornering, and only need careful
adjustment when the car is being used for Town work etc, and where
  
  


Copyright Sustain 2025, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙