Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).
Analysis of the causes, systems, and frequencies of low-speed wobble and high-speed shimmy in automobiles.

Identifier  ExFiles\Box 170\3\  img060
Date  15th July 1935 guessed
  
cars with large masses swinging around the kingpin
have a tendency to the first type, and cars with
small or swinging masses have a tendency to the second.

In the case of low speed wobble or shimmy on smooth
roads one can distinguish two separate vibrating
systems, which must have about the same natural fre-
quency for the cycle to occur at all. The wobbling
of the wheels forms one system in both cases, but
in low speed wobble the second system is a rocking
motion of the car, while in shimmy the second system
is the tramping of the wheels.

In both cases the forward motion of the car feeds
energy into the wobble motion, and the wobble motion
feeds energy into the secondary vibrating system, so that,
once started the cycle will continue indefinitely.

There must also be a detonation, i.e. something to
start the cycle. In low speed wobble this is
generally a road bump, though it can also be a snatch
at the steering wheel. In severe cases it is
impossible to distinguish what starts the wobble as
it appears to grow from no perceptible input.

In shimmy, wheel unbalance is the usual cause, but an
isolated road bump may also start the cycle.

The rocking motion of the car which is an essential
part of low-speed wobble occurs around an inclined
axis passing through the bottom of the windshield,
and the centre of the rear axle. Its frequency
in cases so far examined is about 36 cycles a
minute. Natural frequency of wobble on "Dubonnet"
jobs is about 380-400 cycles a minute.

On Wishbone jobs natural wobble frequency is 200
a minute or more. Tramp frequency with modern
tires is about 540 cycles a minute.

Since more or less of a "match" between the natural
frequency of the two oscillating systems is necessary
before the self-induced cycle will appear, it follows
that Dubonnet jobs have a low speed wobble tendency
but less tendency to shimmy, while Wishbone jobs
are in the reverse case.
  
  


Copyright Sustain 2025, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙