Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).
Power loss analysis related to carburetter and air-silencer modifications.

Identifier  ExFiles\Box 65a\3\  scan0180
Date  20th December 1929 guessed
  
-2-
of the cowling around the air-valve ports. The curve
V.758 shews the power loss caused by this cowling, which amounts
to 3.0% at 2500 R.P.M.
Since fitting the standard air-valve, diaphragm and high
speed choke, the metering was found to be approx. the same as
on the standard carburetter.
Attention was now directed to the air-silencer. When
this was fitted to the modified carburetter the power loss was
still 7.6% at 2500 R.P.M.,(see V758). If the loss due to the
air-ports cowling is subtracted the air silencer is now respon-
sible for 4.6%. To this we must add 2.2% (loss due to std.
air intake), as explained above, making the silencer loss now
total 6.8%. It will be noticed that this is a higher figure
than the loss caused by the silencer on the original carburetter.
This increase is probably due to the extra amount of air with
which it has now to deal. This 6.8% loss may be divided up
between the parts of the air silencer thus:- centre tube (E79642)
= 2.5%; second tube (E79645) = 1.5%; third tube (E79644) = 1.0%;
fourth (outer) tube (E79643) = .5%; the remaining 1.3% being
due to the end pieces (E79577/8). See V.759.
The air holes in the concentric tubes of the silencer
were now enlarged in area by 33%, which reduced the total
silencer loss to 5.7%. Of this figure, the centre tube was
still responsible for 2.4%; so the slots in this tube were enlarged
still more to 94% of their original area.
The complete modified carburetter now shews a power
loss of 5.6% at 2500 R.P.M., which loss is diminished to zero
at 1750 R.P.M. (See V.757).
  
  


Copyright Sustain 2025, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙