Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

Secret memo discussing reasons for not changing from Lucas dynamos and suggesting re-winding armatures in-house due to cost.


Identifier  WestWitteringFiles\L\Jan1924-March1924\  Scan175
Date  1st March 1924
  
R.R. 238A (100 T) (S.H. 159 11-8-20) G. {Mr Griffiths - Chief Accountant / Mr Gnapp} 2800

2

ORIGINAL
SECRET

TO EFC. {E. Fowler Clarke - Electrical Engineer} } FROM R. {Sir Henry Royce} R3/M4. 3. 24.
HS. {Lord Ernest Hives - Chair} }

Copy to C.J.
" WCR.
" RG. {Mr Rowledge}
" L.
" DA. {Bernard Day - Chassis Design}
" BY. {R.W. Bailey - Chief Engineer}

re. LUCAS AND R-R. {Sir Henry Royce} X.30146
dynamos for EAC.3.

I am pleased to hear there are
definite output reasons for not changing the dynamo
from Lucas.

I had lately thought that there
would be changes in the wiring and switch which would
make such a change undesirable.

Also it seems like throwing away
too much.

I think Lucas' are too expensive
for their replace armature. We could re-wind them
ourselves, using some of the old parts - i.e. arma-
ture plates & commutators; this is only a suggestion.

R. {Sir Henry Royce}
  
  
From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).


Copyright Sustain 2026, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙