Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).
Comparing the performance of Watford, Lucas, and Thomson-Houston magnetos for cars and aero engines.

Identifier  ExFiles\Box 57\2\  Scan203
Date  21th June 1928
  
EFC. } FROM R.{Sir Henry Royce}
HS.{Lord Ernest Hives - Chair} }
HY.{Tom Haldenby - Plant Engineer} }
X5790
R1/M21.6.28.
O.{Mr Oldham} to BJ.
" " WOR.{Arthur Wormald - General Works Manager}
" " RG.{Mr Rowledge}
X7791 MAGNETOS. X.8793

CAR.
Mr. Lidsey's report on Phantom experimental cars says that Watford magnetos are quiet, while Lucas are noisy.
This is different to the report by EFC., who judged the Lucas the better.
You will remember that I did not wish to change to Lucas, principally for reasons of reputation, so that I am very pleased to hear that we are not forced to do so by any technical reason of silence or efficiency.
The Watford magneto has several features which are preferable to the Lucas. (They add to the cost, but the price is now quite satisfactory - i.e. commercially OK.)
It is understood that the sleeve type is better for the 20HP.

AERO.
Apparently Thomson-Houston are doing well on aero engines, and there is no reason for changing, so unless I hear to the contrary we shall be getting along with other work.

R.{Sir Henry Royce}
  
  


Copyright Sustain 2025, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙