Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).
Comparative test measuring the velocity of air passing through the radiators on the 40/50 and Goshawk II engines.

Identifier  WestWitteringFiles\I\May1922\  Scan131
Date  30th May 1922
  
To R.{Sir Henry Royce} from Hs.{Lord Ernest Hives - Chair}
c. to CJ.
c. to E.{Mr Elliott - Chief Engineer}
c. to Da.{Bernard Day - Chassis Design}
c. to By.{R.W. Bailey - Chief Engineer}
c. to EP.{G. Eric Platford - Chief Quality Engineer}
c. to Hy.{Tom Haldenby - Plant Engineer} (Laval).

RE GOSHAWK II. COOLING

Handwritten notes: X1757 X3456 X3438 X3472 X766 X4240 X4237 X423

We have made a comparative test measuring the velocity of air passing through the radiator on the 40/50 and the Goshawk. We measured the air by means of a rotary wind gauge. We took three readings in different positions on the radiator at each speed. The fan belts were tightened up in each case. The bonnet and the usual cowling was fitted.

Comparison of speed of air passing through radiator tubes.
Engine revs. | 40/50. | Goshawk II.
1000 | 1190 ft. per min. | 560 ft. per min.
1500 | 1570 | 993
2000 | 1500 | 1320

It will be seen that at low speeds the 40/50 fan is considerably more efficient than Goshawk II, but at high speeds the difference is not so marked. This we suggest is due to the air not being able to get away sufficiently freely on the 40/50 which causes a considerable back pressure under the bonnet. Undoubtedly the first thing to tackle is to make the fan on the Goshawk relatively as efficient as the one we use on the 40/50.

In connection with the airships, a considerable amount of work was done on fans. We tried a number of
  
  


Copyright Sustain 2025, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙