Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).
Report page detailing the performance characteristics of an Ante-Chamber engine design.

Identifier  ExFiles\Box 133\3\  scan0055
Date  3rd March 1939
  
-2- Rm{William Robotham - Chief Engineer}/Edl/R.3.3.39.

Ante-Chamber Design.
(a) Fuel consumption worse than on D.I. engine,
and is seldom better than .400 lbs/BHP/Hr.

(b) The Comet III was relatively insensitive to
fuel quality from 40 cetane upwards, and even
better results were obtained from the Whirlpool.
This latter head, however, was not recommended
for use on high speed engines due to excessive
thermal stresses where the two holes of the
venturi cross each other, causing cracking.

(c) Good high speed torque, but power at low speeds
was less than with the D.I. combustion chamber.

(d) The heat loss to the coolant greater than on
the D.I. Unit, comparative figures being 70%
for the ante-chamber as against 55-60% for the
D.I.

(e) Diesel knock was better and maximum pressures
lower.

(f) Heater plugs essential for starting, though an
alternative method of heating the intake air
may be adopted.

(g) Compression Ratio has got to be somewhat higher -
17-20 ratios.

(h) A Comet III engine, opened up to full load -
100 B.M.E.P. @ 2000 R.P.M. - from a tick-over
speed showed only a slight puff of smoke, and
was completely odourless at the above rating

In conjunction with the Comet III head,
Ricardo's have developed a new type of cavity in the piston
crown consisting of two recesses to match up with the valves
between which there is a channel lining up with the venturi.
This is a progressive move in that it enables the designer
to alter his valve timing to some extent without hitting the
piston.

It is interesting to compare the view with
that of Leyland and A.E.C. who have both discontinued work
on the ante-chamber heads in favour of direct injection, the
reasons put forward for this change were the poorer fuel con-
sumption of the ante-chamber head, the increased heat flow,
and the necessity for heater plugs to assist starting.
  
  


Copyright Sustain 2025, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙