Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).
Camshaft drive failures, focusing on damping friction and proposing design improvements.

Identifier  ExFiles\Box 43\3\  Scan152
Date  24th March 1927
  
To RG.{Mr Rowledge}
Hs.{Lord Ernest Hives - Chair}
BY.{R.W. Bailey - Chief Engineer} from R.{Sir Henry Royce} & E.{Mr Elliott - Chief Engineer} X4003 R1/M24.3.27.
c. to BJ. Wor.{Arthur Wormald - General Works Manager}

RR. F.10. CAMSHAFT DRIVES. X.4003
X.3844

While Mr. Hives was here we discussed the
above failure outside such faults as seized shafts and spring drive.
I think we should avoid any unnecessary damping friction by seeing
if we can do without all of it, because any friction tends to
cancel the effectiveness of the spring drive.

i.e. test 'without friction in spring drive'.

and 'maximum angular clearance'.

Having this we should avoid any possibility of
unhardened slack - i.e. where-ever there is possibility of
slack the surfaces should be hardened.

'Possibly magneto drives both hardened wheels'.

We suggest also rubber drive for magnetos (Sim's patent).

It will be observed that crankshaft speed
variations at 2000 revs. are 12,000 per min., extremely rapid,
and hence severe unless there is effective elasticity in the
transmission between the source and the inertia.

You have now the wheel that sheared its splines
fitted tightly on a cone with keys, same as our earlier practice.

R.{Sir Henry Royce}
  
  


Copyright Sustain 2025, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙