Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

Test drive report on experimental car 35-EX (a P.III), comparing it unfavourably with a Cadillac V.8 and highlighting issues with engine detonation, obtrusiveness, poor fuel consumption, and roughness


Identifier  ExFiles\Box 96\3\  scan0043
Date  13th January 1936
  
C. Mx {John H Maddocks - Chief Proving Officer} x360

H3

To Ros. from Sg. {Arthur F. Sidgreaves - MD}
Copy to E.Hs. {Lord Ernest Hives - Chair} Hr.
G.Cr. {Mr Cra’ster / Mr Chichester}

re 35-EX. P.III. Sg {Arthur F. Sidgreaves - MD} 2/E13.1.36

I tried the above car this week-end, which was, I think, my first opportunity of giving a P.III a real run as distinct from trials on the bypass roads or short drives from Derby to Nottingham.

I was very pleased with the riding, the brakes, the clutch, the steering and its freedom from joggles, although I thought it rather on the heavy side.

I am sorry to say that I was disappointed with the engine. After my trial of the Cadillac V.8 last week I found the P.III engine definitely more obtrusive under all conditions of pulling.

I also found that it detonated very freely when picking up from low speeds - in fact I do not consider that the amount of detonation is passable.

I am also sorry to say that the obtrusiveness or fuss - or whatever one likes to call it - of the engine is greater on this car than on my 20/25 with the bored out engine.

The [unclear] petrol consumption over a run of about 180 miles worked out at 8 1/2 and I am told that over a longer distance, i.e. 1200 miles, it has worked out at 8.7.

I hope that with the downdraught carburetter the petrol consumption is going to be considerably better as we shall, I am afraid, receive a lot of complaints if the petrol consumption is much worse than P.II, i.e. 10 or 11.

I understand that we are meeting Rm. {William Robotham - Chief Engineer} with 35-EX on Thursday and, if any one does not agree my views about the engine, I should be very pleased to demonstrate it as we shall bring 35-EX along.

There is a definite roughness in the engine at about 50/60 which is sufficiently noticeable to show itself in the dither of the dashboard mirror.

As we have been told on many occasions that the 12-cylinder is the ideal, I should be glad to know how we propose to make it ideal on this car.

Sg. {Arthur F. Sidgreaves - MD}
  
  
From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).


Copyright Sustain 2026, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙