Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).
Analysis of exhaust system losses on the big bore Bentley engine compared to the small bore.

Identifier  ExFiles\Box 86\3\  scan0162
Date  24th March 1936
  
X223

To E.{Mr Elliott - Chief Engineer}
c. to By.{R.W. Bailey - Chief Engineer}

Hs{Lord Ernest Hives - Chair}/Rm.{William Robotham - Chief Engineer}2/KW.24.3.36.

Herewith an analysis of the present standard exhaust system losses on the big bore Bentley compared with losses on the small bore.

Engine Unit | B.H.P. Developed at 3750 R.P.M. | Loss to complete Exhaust System
3.25 Bore | 110 H.P. | 14 HP. 12.7%
3.500 Bore | 131 H.P. | 18 HP. 13.7%

Analysis of losses on present standard System at 3750 r.p.m. Big Bore Unit.

Power developed at this speed 131 B.H.P.

Item | B.H.P. Lost.
Manifold | 3.5
Standard downtake pipe, front expansion box, inter. pipe and 1st silencer | 4.5
2nd intermediate pipe | 2.5
Standard rear silencer | 6.5
Tail pipe | 1.0

A larger manifold will enable us to fit a larger downtake pipe also. It is rather surprising that the standard exhaust system, when all the baffles are removed, loses 8 B.H.P. We have an experimental rear expansion box with a re-arrangement of baffles which saves 2 B.H.P. and is at present running 15,000 miles. The best we have been able to do with a straight-through system to rear box only is 19 1/2 B.H.P. loss.

Hs{Lord Ernest Hives - Chair}/Rm.{William Robotham - Chief Engineer}
  
  


Copyright Sustain 2025, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙