Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).
Analysis of engine loads and the effect of balance weights on them, with results presented in tables.

Identifier  ExFiles\Box 115\2\  scan0382
Date  10th January 1939 guessed
  
- 4 -

RESULTS.

(a) Without balance weights.

At Explosion.

2600 2850
179 MEP. 206 179 206

Radial .00081 .00092 ( These are lower ( None of
Tangential .000433 .00063 ( than for 2600 ( these is
Resultant .000925 .00112 ( and are not ( great enough
( included. ( to cause
( fouling.
Radial .000614 .00113
Tangential .000554 .00052
Resultant .000825 .00125

The worst inertia loads occur in the region of crank angles
about 570° from 'A' side T.D.C. and at 2850 RPM. The figures
below are at 206 MEP.

The loads are Radial 10580 11030 11260 11380
Tangential 3650 2940 2130 1320

slopes R.{Sir Henry Royce} .00172 .00178 .00182 .00184
T. .000312 .000251 .000182 .000113

Resultant slopes .00175 .00180 .00183 .00184

None of these will cause fouling, and therefore no fixing
couple will be applied by the bearing.

(b) Effect of balancing.

At the time of the explosion the effect of the balance
weights is to increase the deflection, on the other hand where
the load is due mainly to inertia the balance weights reduce
the slope.

Force due to balance weights at 2600 RPM. where the
explosion force is most noticeable is 1760 lbs.

. The slope (radial) due to this is 1.05 x 10^-7 x 1760
.. = .000184

Applying this to the slopes above
2600 - 179 MEP. 2600 - 206 MEP.

Radial .000798 .00094 .001104 .001134
Tangential .000554 .000433 .00063 .00052
Resultant .000974 .001034 .00127 .00125

None of these loads therefore will cause fouling but the slopes
up to .0013" per inch are quite considerable and imply edge
loading of the bearings.

(C) The assumptions in the above case do not meet the
requirements of the case as rest of the shaft does exert some
constraint on the throw considered (either end throw).

It is now assumed that the journal at one end of the throw
is constrained to be horizontal - journal 2 or 6 - and that the
shaft is supported on the centre this journal while the other
end is free and supported on the edge of its bearing.
  
  


Copyright Sustain 2025, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙