Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).
Unsatisfactory performance of rubber engine feet bolts and proposing the use of tight-fitting bolts as a solution.

Identifier  ExFiles\Box 65\4\  scan0122
Date  12th December 1928
  
To E.{Mr Elliott - Chief Engineer} from Hs{Lord Ernest Hives - Chair}/Rm.{William Robotham - Chief Engineer}
+8005
Hs{Lord Ernest Hives - Chair}/Rm{William Robotham - Chief Engineer}3/LGL2.12.28.
c. to BY.{R.W. Bailey - Chief Engineer}
c. to Wor.{Arthur Wormald - General Works Manager}

RUBBER ENGINE FEET. +7005

The bolts on these engine feet indicated in the attached sketch have never been very satisfactory. Their average life on the bump is something under 30 hrs. In addition, on examining those off 12-EX after 7000 miles we found that they had worn badly, so much so that the engine was moving about independently without utilising the rubber.
We can improve the wearing qualities by hardening but hardly the life. We find however that if we make the bolts a tight fit, i.e. slightly taper with reamered holes, we do not seem to encounter any disadvantage while the bolts have run 100 hrs. without failure. We appreciate that the stress on the spring strips may go up because the frame has to 'breathe' to allow the foreshortening of these strips, but in practice this does not seem to affect the life of the strips or the frame. We therefore suggest that we should use tight fitting bolts in this position.

Hs{Lord Ernest Hives - Chair}/Rm.{William Robotham - Chief Engineer}
  
  


Copyright Sustain 2025, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙