Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

Memo discussing design problems and defending a designer referred to as 'DA' against another named 'E'.


Identifier  Morton\M22\  img143
Date  13th January 1922 guessed
  
*HS {Lord Ernest Hives - Chair}
E has clearly tried to get a crafty one in on Hs {Lord Ernest Hives - Chair} , but has reckoned without Hs {Lord Ernest Hives - Chair} 's phenomenal memory. I knowledgely. F.W. hates what
E have to include in this memo, with its undertones, going to C.J.
C C.J. DA {Bernard Day - Chassis Design} whom I'd consistently over many years played down & finally out-manoeuvered DA {Bernard Day - Chassis Design} was a great & gifted designer, completely devoid of guile, & absolutely stone found in all his dealings.
R had great confidence in DA {Bernard Day - Chassis Design} to cope with everything except the engine (E's baby).
This smothered massive & great enmity
problems - Steering, road holding, springing, Brakes, gearbox, rear & front axles, bodywork.
In comparison, the engine was a 'bottys jil'.
Since DA {Bernard Day - Chassis Design} 's engines was clear of 'engines', why should He have sent him a copy?
There is an unmistakable 'bile' in this memo.
  
  
From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).


Copyright Sustain 2026, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙