Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).
Providing technical remarks on preliminary design investigations for the Phoenix Engine Unit.

Identifier  ExFiles\Box 111\2\  scan0224
Date  20th August 1937
  
[Handwritten crossed out text: To B.M.]
[Handwritten crossed out text: From Dr.]
c. to Rm.{William Robotham - Chief Engineer}

[Handwritten top right]: 1044 8/0

BY/Jnr.{Charles L. Jenner}1/G.20.8.37.

[Handwritten note]: Items not mentioned are those where I think we can work in your recommendations. JNR{Charles L. Jenner}

PHOENIX ENGINE UNIT.

Re: Rm.{William Robotham - Chief Engineer}1/AP.18.8.37.

Preliminary design investigations shew that when keeping in mind saving of cost and weight, the engine layout takes form on certain lines.

My remarks on each item :-

(2). If we use loose liners and cut everything down to a minimum there would be a saving of .75 on the engine length, the length of the Chevolet and Vauxhall is same as Bentley, the Vauxhall has smaller bore.
[Handwritten note in left margin next to (2)]: Not worth it

(3). Having the horizontal joint on the crankshaft centre line saves 10 lbs. in weight as against 2 1/2" below, it involves making a sump joint which has to fit tightly around two circular bearing caps. I feel we might have trouble with this construction and suggest that the Works should see the Vauxhall and voice their opinion.
[Handwritten note in left margin next to (3)]: Put up to R.H.C

Another doubtful point is the attachment of the gear box to the top half of the crankcase only, via the clutch casing.
[Handwritten note in left margin next to this paragraph]: Could be

(4). Feel that the crankshaft is the heart of the engine, America would have 7 bearings if they could afford, there is no saving in length with a 4 bearing shaft. We might review the boring for the pins and journal and use cross drillings OR tubes (we failed before on Ph.ll).

Oil flinger compartment might have a submerged return pipe which prevents back pressure.

(6). The layout of the oil pump which is a cross drive at the centre of the engine dictates a high position, now will this prime satisfactorily, could we make an experiment ?

(8). An outside slipper damper is good, but when combined with a crankshaft pinion spring drive becomes cumbersome. Can we delete the latter. Terraplane and Studebaker have none with timing gears.
  
  


Copyright Sustain 2025, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙