Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).
Report page on a vehicle breakdown, comparing magneto and battery ignition systems and concluding with a recommendation.

Identifier  ExFiles\Box 21\4\  Scan105
Date  1st July 1922 guessed
  
(2)

of magneto armature was hopelessly broken down - I put the car in a farm shed and came home on a Ford, a lesson to be burnt from a master.
(1) If this is a specimen of Delage effort to cut out RR. it is not a bit like a RR.
(2) Double spark magnetos which naturally requires double the difference of KBP are not reliable and need a higher speed for starting.
(3) I should prefer battery ignition for investigation to magnetos if only one ignition is fitted.
(4) The advantage of 2 separate ignitions (one being battery, for starting,) is in investigation in case of fault - because if the engine fails one can tell at once if it is faulty ignition or carburation.

When the engine stopped I felt hopelessly lost for a few minutes as to how to find the cause (through absence of battery ignition, and bad starter motor) and I had not had a hopeless stop since about 1906.

REPAIR AND SELL THE ROTTER.

R.{Sir Henry Royce}

[Handwritten notes in left margin:]
X.9199
X.7-29
87c.
  
  


Copyright Sustain 2025, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙