Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).
Issue of noisy 'booming bodies' on a limousine and suggesting potential solutions and sales instructions.

Identifier  ExFiles\Box 5\2\  02-page204
Date  2nd November 1928
  
Hs.{Lord Ernest Hives - Chair} from R.{Sir Henry Royce}

c. to BJ. SG.{Arthur F. Sidgreaves - MD}
c. to DA.{Bernard Day - Chassis Design} E.{Mr Elliott - Chief Engineer}
c. to BY.{R.W. Bailey - Chief Engineer} C.
c. to PN.{Mr Northey} CWB.

X5830

HL/102.11.28.

BOOMING BODIES - TURBULENT HEAD X.790 AND COMPRESSION RATIO.
X.7830
X.8830
X.5830

I have enquired into the question of the booming limousine which, through being defective, was not available at the Show, and find that it is a type of body which is generally considered extremely difficult to get silent, so much so that the original metal top was cut out and replaced by leather. It may be understood that this did not entirely cure the trouble.

I have already suggested that this type of body be tried on an underframe with rubber mounting.

I am now suggesting that in our standard instructions to salesmen we ought to point out that this is a type of body which will probably give the owner much less satisfaction than a type of limmsine in which the whole of the upper work is covered with leather or fabric.

I feel sure that no sensible buyer would insist upon having a type of body if it were well known and admitted by the coachbuilders to be a definitely noisy body on all kinds of chassis, and until we have found a design which avoids the trouble we should ende-avour to persuade buyers to have some other type.

There is not the sligtest doubt that body noises are, and naturally will be, the most difficult and most noticeable defects that are likely to spoil the reputation of a car.

Bodies which are naturally not of a silent construct ion will be noisy from road vibrations. However, as far as I know there is not a shadow of a reason why the turbulent head should give greater vibrations, unless the compression is different, but this is not so, as proved by the absence of increase in HP. Hence, either it is a bad body for noise (which I believe), or Sales are hypercritical, however free the chassis is from vibrations.

Therefore it would still be desirable to have bodies which are fundamentally silent, even if we had no engine and gears on the chassis.

R.{Sir Henry Royce}
  
  


Copyright Sustain 2025, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙