Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).
Expressing concern over the proposal to tighten shock-absorbers on the chassis without design modifications.

Identifier  ExFiles\Box 105\3\  scan0004
Date  17th October 1925
  
COPY. X5520

TO BJ.
PN{Mr Northey}1/DN17.10.25.
From PN.{Mr Northey}

I drew your attention recently to two Standardisation Sheets in respect of shock-absorbers on our chassis being set up tighter. I did not sign these because I was not aware of any modification being proposed which would prevent undue wear and tear arising from the additional strains.

I gather from the attached memo (Hs{Lord Ernest Hives - Chair}3/LG16.10.25) that it is proposed to tighten up shock-absorbers without making any modification to their design.

I have consistently from the birth of the 20 H.P. held and stated that the shock-absorbers were practically of no use, other than as a decoration, perhaps, by reason of the fact that the friction was altogether too small. Now it appears that R.{Sir Henry Royce} considers the chassis so much improved by having an adequate amount of friction that its value may be considered £300 greater.

I do not consider that the position is at all desirable when we contemplate that by the course proposed, shock-absorbers will probably be giving trouble demonstrated by a never-ceasing tendency to rattle and clatter after about 100 miles. Of course, if it is proposed to run a 10,000 miles test of shock-absorbers tightened, then it is not necessary to say anything more about it, merely to wait for results.

P.N.
  
  


Copyright Sustain 2025, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙