Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

Views on the 'Peregrine' production programme, specifically concerning the gearbox size and strength.


Identifier  ExFiles\Box 1\8\  B001_X100 Engine Chassis-page046
Date  15th July 1932
  
Private
To E. {Mr Elliott - Chief Engineer} Hs. {Lord Ernest Hives - Chair}
from Wor. {Arthur Wormald - General Works Manager}
x40-7.
Wor {Arthur Wormald - General Works Manager} 2/T15.7.32.

In view of the possibility of a conference with you on the production of "Peregrine(Experimental Bentley car never produced / Aero Engine)" quickly, I thought it would help if I gave my considered views as to how the programme could be carried out, and my views generally. I hope they may be helpful.

I did remark to R. {Sir Henry Royce} that the gear box looked smaller in proportion when attached to the engine than in our general run of chassis, but of course, I did not express any opinion on the strength of the gears etc. because I have not the necessary data and information to enable me to give an opinion. I am assured by BY. {R.W. Bailey - Chief Engineer} , who has worked out the figures, that the stresses are no greater than in the 20/25 box which gives quite satisfactory service.

Wor. {Arthur Wormald - General Works Manager}

attd. considered views on
Peregrine(Experimental Bentley car never produced / Aero Engine) dated
15.7.32.
  
  
From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).


Copyright Sustain 2026, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙