Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).
Petrol consumption tests comparing S.U. carburettors with R.R. Semi-expanding carburettors.

Identifier  ExFiles\Box 1\8\  B001_X100 Engine Chassis-page264
Date  15th May 1933
  
X4027a

Rm.{William Robotham - Chief Engineer} from G.H.Whyman.

15.5.33.

PETROL CONSUMPTIONS WITH S.U. CARBS.
& R.R. SEMI-EXPANDING CARBS.

We have now completed a series of petrol consumption tests on 3.Per.II and 5.Per.II cars, with Twin S.U. Carbs., R.R. Semi-expanding Cards, small P.II. type, and large P.II. type.

The following tables give the results obtained :-

1st Test.

Route :- Derby, Loughborough, Six Hills, Melton Mowbray, Oakham, Stamford, Huntingdon, and return back to Derby.

3.Per.II.
(Twin S.U. Carbs.fitted).

Mileage 160
Petrol used 8 galls. 7 pts.
Petrol Cons. 18 m.p.g.
Oil Used 1.5 pts.
Oil Cons. 853 m.p.g.
Time taken 3 hrs. 50 mins.
Average speed 41.74 m.p.h.

5.Per.II.
(Large P.II. type carb. fitted with needle taper .140" - .070").

160
10 galls. 2 pts.
15.6 m.p.g.
1.0 pt.
1280 m.p.g.
3 hrs 50 mins.
41.74 m.p.h.

There was very little difference in the performances of the two cars except at the top speeds when 3.Per.II. definitely prooved itself a little faster. Maximum speeds attained on road over the same stretch, and in the same direction were :- 3.Per.II, 75 m.p.h; 5.Per.II, 71 m.p.h.
Both cars suffer from intake roar, 5.Per.II. being much worse than 3.Per.II.

Cont'd -
  
  


Copyright Sustain 2025, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙