Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).
Wear, breakages, and observations on rear axles, shafts, and springs from various test cars.

Identifier  ExFiles\Box 46\2\  Scan250
Date  15th March 1917 guessed
  
contd:-

-4-

We are rebuilding them without touching them as they are still fit for service. The joints on this car do not appear to receive sufficient lubrication. We have examined the joints on 1-Goshawk-11 and 2-Goshawk-11 which have run 11,000 miles and 7,000 miles respectively and these joints have been kept lubricated. They have been lubricated every 1000 miles. On these cars the shafts-are-very-satisfactory. wear is a very small amount. On the whole, we should that the Universal Joint and Propeller shafts are very satisfactory.

REAR AXLE. We have had a rear axle shaft break on 1-Goshawk-11. It was broke off at the end of the serrations. The driving shaft on the other side was found to be twisted badly. We think the reason 1-Goshawk-11 shafts have broken and that we have not had trouble on other cars, is due to the fact that this car has been used for Clutch experiments. We have, however, got to bear in mind that when the cars get into Customers hands, they will have less experienced drivers and use the car in hilly districts so that the life of the axle shafts must be increased. The Differential Bevel Wheels formed on the axle shafts have shown excessive wear on all axles which have been examined. On the early axles we attributed it to the fact that we were running Reinecker Pinions with B & S cut wheels, but on 5-Goshawk-11 which had Reinecker cut gears throughout, the wear was excessive on the bevel wheels formed on the shaft and these will have to be replaced before the car can be run again.
We have instructions for trying nickel chrome pinions to mesh with the nickel chrome shaft instead of as at present, hardened pinions. There is also instructed some axle shafts in air hardened steel. This-was-the-standard. The bevel thrust on 5-Goshawk-11 we found the races have scored. This was the standard type of thrust bearing. We have other alternative schemes using New Derpature bearings which, so far, have not been tested severely.
The spring rest fixed to the axle tube on the N.S., was loose on 5-Goshawk-11. It is possible that this was never fitted sufficiently tight, as the one on the other side is perfectly alright. The tie rod under the axle was found loose on 5-Goshawk-11 car. It appeared as though the aluminium axle box had rubbed away.

SPRINGS & FITTINGS. We have had 3 top leaves break on the cars run in France. On 5-Goshawk-11 the O.S. broke after 9000 miles, the N.S. was found cracked right across when the car reached Derby. The top leaf was broke on 6-Goshawk-11 after 3000 miles in France. It is noticeable on the Goshawk that with the car sprung to give the correct cambre at normal load, the front axle gets on to the buffers much more on this car than on the 40/50. In France the front axle is continually bumping on the buffers; even on the roads around Derby, we frequently get this happening. One suggested explanation for this is that the unsprung weight compared with the sprung weight is more on the Goshawk than on the 40/50 H.P. This is owing to the large wheels and tyres used. We will, at thefirst opportunity, give comparisons of these cars.

contd:-
  
  


Copyright Sustain 2025, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙