Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

Report from Mr. Ellis on the performance of a Carpentier trembler action coil compared to standard coils.


Identifier  ExFiles\Box 3\1\  01-page153
Date  29th April 1915
  
X-185

Wor {Arthur Wormald - General Works Manager} /Mcr10/L29.4.15.

R. {Sir Henry Royce}

J. {Mr Johnson W.M.} c. 29.4.15.

X.1309. X.562. X.185.

With reference to your memo R15/IB22.4.15.

Mr. Ellis reports as follows :-

"*I will put in hand at once a Carpentier trembler
"*action coil, the previous ones No.3307 and 3215
"*have evidently gone away on chassis. These were
"*reported on Nov.18th 1909 along with the Castle,
"*and if you remember they did not compare with
"*our standard coils both in regard to speed,
"*consumption (very heavy) and very noisy.

"*In regard to the separate trembler coil, I have
"*still got the one which was fitted in a smalk
"*aluminium box and a separate coil, the two which
"*were made combined have been lost or despatched by
"*the West Garage. I cannot understand why this
"*was discarded, I consider that there is no comparison
"*with any of the other coils or any other make.
"*It is fool-proof in regard to the turn of the screw on
"*any speed and not limited to a 1/8" of a turn; consumption
"*very low and regular, speed much higher and quieter,
"*splendid on the platinums.
"*Shall I rig this up with the trembler self contained
"*or make this separate as before".

Mcr.
  
  
From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).


Copyright Sustain 2026, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙