Analysis of competitor 8-cylinder vee engines, noting their unimpressive performance and issues with torsional vibration.
| Identifier | ExFiles\Box 127\2\ scan0009 | |
| Date | 16th October 1929 | |
| To R. {Sir Henry Royce} From Hs {Lord Ernest Hives - Chair} /Rn. {Mr Robinson} c. to SG. {Arthur F. Sidgreaves - MD} c. to Wor. {Arthur Wormald - General Works Manager} Rg. {Mr Rowledge} c. to E. {Mr Elliott - Chief Engineer} By. {R.W. Bailey - Chief Engineer} X3929 Hs {Lord Ernest Hives - Chair} /Rn {Mr Robinson} 6/AD.16.10.29. X.4449 X.4024 X.3531 X.1729 X.3929 X.4048 8-CYLINDER VEE ENGINES. We have now tried four cars with 8-cylinder vee engines, La {L. A. Archer} Salle, Cadillac, Lincoln and Lancia. On the whole they have not been impressive. They have not been any better on the pick up than a good six, and compare even less favourably with a good straight eight which has similar cylinder size. The differences are not great but when changing over to a different type car engine, one would naturally look for improvement over the six in every respect. The 8 cylinder vee engine does not appear to be free from crankshaft torsional vibration. The Lincoln have been forced to fit a crankshaft damper, in the Lancia the torsioanl vibration is definately present. The main advantage the vee eight possess, apart from its compactness, appears to be absence of inertia torque giving a smooth over-run. We suggest that the V eight engine crankshaft will have to be relatively stiff to avoid the master period if used with a supercharger. Hs {Lord Ernest Hives - Chair} /Rn. {Mr Robinson} | ||
From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).