Arguing against increasing the cooling capacity on Phantom cars, referencing a technical explanation.
| Identifier | ExFiles\Box 66a\4\ scan0216 | |
| Date | 1st July 1926 | |
| To BJ. from Hs. {Lord Ernest Hives - Chair} c. to Wor. {Arthur Wormald - General Works Manager} PNj c. to BY. {R.W. Bailey - Chief Engineer} ✓ CWB. c. to EP. {G. Eric Platford - Chief Quality Engineer} ✓ X8250 Hs {Lord Ernest Hives - Chair} 2/LG2. 7. 26. re: Bt. {Capt. J. S. Burt - Engineer} 118-MC CAR. X766 X8950 Answering your BJ9/E30.6.26. We think we ought to point out that there is no suggestion of increasing the cooling capacity on Phantom cars. We do not consider that Bt {Capt. J. S. Burt - Engineer} 's experience justifies any action being taken when we consider all the various difficulties to carry this out. Did Bt. {Capt. J. S. Burt - Engineer} run with the shutters in the bonnet open? - no mention is made of this. In the technical information issued by the Experimental Dept. in the section on 'Cooling', it is explained why a small car can always be more effectively cooled than a big one. Hs. {Lord Ernest Hives - Chair} | ||
From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).