Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

Comparison of engine performance between 3 and 4 port manifolds with single and double outlets.


Identifier  ExFiles\Box 86\3\  scan0216
Date  13th April 1938
  
-2-
The loss in power between the 3 and 4 port manifolds is practically negligible, the 4 port being slightly the better of the two. (Curve A and B).

Graph A:
B.23. O.H.C. VALVE TIMING. I.O. 2° BT. {Capt. J. S. Burt - Engineer} E.O.43° B.B.
I.C. 33° PB E.C. 12° PT.
LB.8 PLUGS. TAPPETS AT .006"
ETHYL FUEL.
OPEN EXHAUST.
4 PORT MANIFOLD
SINGLE OUTLET.
3 PORT MANIFOLD
SINGLE OUTLET.
B.H.P. & M.E.P.
MEP
BHP
3 PORT MANIFOLD
4 PORT MANIFOLD
R.P.M.

Graph B:
B.23. O.H.C. VALVE TIMING. I.O. 2° BT {Capt. J. S. Burt - Engineer} E.O.43° B.B.
I.C. 33° PB E.C. 12° PT.
LB.8 PLUGS. TAPPETS AT .006"
ETHYL FUEL.
OPEN EXHAUST.
4 PORT MANIFOLD
DOUBLE OUTLET.
3 PORT MANIFOLD
DOUBLE OUTLET.
B.M.E.P.
BHP
3 PORT MANIFOLD
4 PORT MANIFOLD
R.P.M.

Continued.
  
  
From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).


Copyright Sustain 2026, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙