Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

Letter discussing development, testing, and issues with Goshawk II cars, models 6-G-II and 7-G-II.


Identifier  ExFiles\Box 46\2\  Scan183
Date  25th April 1922
  
[Handwritten annotations at top]
Hs. {Lord Ernest Hives - Chair} from EP. {G. Eric Platford - Chief Quality Engineer} (at Laval.)
X4219
mins Noted file ES
X4086 Warwick Bownly note

Re. GOSHAWK(Aero Engine)(Codename for 20HP Car / Aero Engine after Kestrel(Aero Engine)) II CARS.

We are anxious to hear from you re the running of 6-G-II, and why the new parts were required which we sent to you per Aeroplane as requested. [Handwritten] We nudged a tram car in Avignon.

It would appear from Hy {Tom Haldenby - Plant Engineer} 's telegram for new brushes for dynamo that you have arrived safely at Laval.

We have received a report from R. {Sir Henry Royce} dealing with several points, copy of which we are sending to Hy. {Tom Haldenby - Plant Engineer} tonight, along with a report of our own experience with dynamo brushes on 7-G-II, which we are now testing. [Handwritten] See reports

We are trying as far as possible to embody all the various alterations or improvements etc. which have come from you or R. {Sir Henry Royce} on 7-G-II. I shall be glad therefore if you will keep me in touch with the latest information regarding these matters.

No mention is made in regard to 6-G-II of the rattles in the drive which I was rather concerned about, and although there has been no definite complaint so far of this fault on 7-G-II, in trying this car today I was certainly able to reproduce a similar defect, although nothing like as serious as on 6-G-II. I am not however, troubling with this at present as evidently this fault does not appear to be considered serious, unless I hear from you otherwise. [Handwritten] See reports

On the contrary we are rather specialising with carburation on 7-G-II, the prospects of which are now much better. As soon as we are in a position to obtain satisfactory or best possible results with the suggested improvements made, we will try and arrange for such modifications to be added or altered for 6-G-II.

No mention has been made of the shackle covers for 6-G-II. Are there any comments in this direction with this job. We have a similar set fixed on 7-G-II and we are also fixing some steering joint covers, also arranging for a set to be made up so that we can send out to be fixed on 6-G-II. [Handwritten] It is quite agreeable to these if it enables us to make the best job possible & cheap.

We would like to settle all such features as these, so that we can prepare the material in readiness for fixing on to a car (preferably 5-G-II after 10,000 mile test which is to be used as an Amateur test car-. At the same time we do not wish to spend any more money and time on such jobs if they are not looked upon favourably by R. {Sir Henry Royce}

R. {Sir Henry Royce} complains that the springs on 6-G-II are rather stronger than required. As a matter of fact, these were the weakest we had got at the time. Can you give us a record of the

CONTD.
  
  
From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).


Copyright Sustain 2026, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙