Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

Questioning the standardisation of pistons made in RR.50 alloy without a 10,000-mile test.


Identifier  ExFiles\Box 15\3\  Scan046
Date  29th September 1930
  
H S
Y7040.
To Hs. {Lord Ernest Hives - Chair} from Sg. {Arthur F. Sidgreaves - MD} re Pistons made in RR.50 Alloy. Sg {Arthur F. Sidgreaves - MD} 32/E29.9.30 X)040 x5040
Copy to Wor. {Arthur Wormald - General Works Manager}

I have just seen Standardisation Sheet X.No.7040/5040 dated the 4.9.30 in respect of the adoption of the above for both the Phantom and 20/25 chassis.

EP {G. Eric Platford - Chief Quality Engineer} , I see, has said against his signature that he assumes a 10,000 miles test has been made and that it was OK. PN {Mr Northey} mentions that there does not seem to be any indication as to on what grounds the change is suggested.

I gather that a 10,000 mile test has not been made as there is no reference to it on the sheet, and before agreeing to its standardisation, I should like to know what experience we have of this metal when used for pistons in our cars - in other words why has it been suggested that in this case we can depart from our usual procedure.

Sg. {Arthur F. Sidgreaves - MD}

[STAMP: RECEIVED SEP 30 1930 H~]
  
  
From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).


Copyright Sustain 2026, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙