Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

Letter to the Engineering Laboratory in Cambridge regarding crankshaft dimensions, test results, and a formula for estimating torsional periods.


Identifier  ExFiles\Box 25\3\  Scan344
Date  3rd May 1928
  
X634

Expt: Dept:
Hs {Lord Ernest Hives - Chair} /Ten2/LG.
3rd. May 1928.

H. {Arthur M. Hanbury - Head Complaints} Constant Esq.,
Engineering Laboratory,
Cambridge.

X8010
X5010 -> for prints

Dear Constant,

CRANKSHAFTS.

I attach a table which gives the dimensions and results of tests on practically all the shafts that we have had experience with. The crankshaft named 'India(Production 20 HP. with 4-speed box and Front Wheel Brakes) 111' is a stiffer version of the standard 20 HP., with 1/8" on the journals, and .550" on the width of the webs.

The figure given in this table for the web width is the one I use in Carter's formula, i.e. the mean value if it is varying. When a web is described as 'oval', it has an elliptical section transverse to the crankshaft axis. When described as 'bevelled' it has a flat on the outer edge at the crank pin end only.

I also send you a table shewing the results of our simple method of estimating torsional periods in car engines. The formula used is:

Critical r.p.m. = 60/n x 1/2π x √Cs(1/Tc + 1/Tf {T. Fisher} )

n = No. of vibrations per rev. which is
3 in a 6-cyl.
4 in a straight-8.
6 in a twin-6.

Cs = stiffness of whole shaft (including nose etc.) in lbs.ft/radian as measured.

Tc = effective inertia of crankshaft system in 'slugs-ft²'

Tf {T. Fisher} = Flywheel inertia.

contd :-
  
  
From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).


Copyright Sustain 2026, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙