Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

Customer complaint letter regarding poor brake performance on a 3.5 litre Bentley and a Phantom.


Identifier  ExFiles\Box 18\5\  Scan030
Date  14th December 1934 guessed
  
BYFLEET 223.

GRASMERE,
BYFLEET,
SURREY.

3.

Please note that the brake test figure for the 3½ litre Bentley is below the average figure for 52 British cars.

I am no admirer of the pseudo experts of the "technical"press, but the conclusion here must be that the Bentley's brakes are in no way outstanding when compared with a number of cars the average cost of which work out at £387.

I had not intended to go further into this question of brakes with Rolls Royce, as I was so disgusted with their treatment and outlook that I had decided to dispose of the car and purchase another make.

However, Mr Summers gave me to understand that you were interested in the matter, and I will therefore defer my decision until I hear from you. I should like to keep the Phantom as it is an excellant car in many ways. The brakes, however have been a continual source of trouble, and the manufacturers seem to be either unable to or uninterested in getting them right.

I trust that you will not object to my bringing this matter to your attention. I should however, provided you can
  
  
From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).


Copyright Sustain 2026, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙