Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).
Disagreeing with altering the .720 worm standard, discussing nut casting and oil efficiency.

Identifier  ExFiles\Box 67\4\  scan0029
Date  13th March 1926
  
To DA.{Bernard Day - Chassis Design} from R.{Sir Henry Royce}

c. to CJ. BY.{R.W. Bailey - Chief Engineer}
c. to HS.{Lord Ernest Hives - Chair} E.{Mr Elliott - Chief Engineer}

[Handwritten] X8430

R1/M13.3.26.

RE. N.SCH. 2155. X.8430 [struck through]

I am not in agreement with altering the .720 worm as now standard. It is for the Works to make them more uniform. They will always wear into a better condition.
One feels that a well polished accurate worm is necessary, and that the nut should be cast on the thread, or cast on a good master. We thought a little while ago that the stronger metal coming down between the thread was not necessary: it would be so much simpler without this. Possibly the nut could be longer. Considering that we have the swivelling nut I feel certain the Works have nothing to complain about.
It is a good test for oil efficiency, and the castor oil should shew up and have a more permanent film - (give steadier results.)

R.{Sir Henry Royce}
  
  


Copyright Sustain 2025, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙