Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).
Non-acceptance of a 20HP rear wheel carrier and rigidity issues with the standard Phantom type.

Identifier  WestWitteringFiles\S\2April1928-June1928\  Scan046
Date  20th April 1928
  
HS.{Lord Ernest Hives - Chair} FROM DA.{Bernard Day - Chassis Design}

ORIGINAL

DA{Bernard Day - Chassis Design}5/M20.4.28.

REAR WHEEL CARRIERS. X7600 X8600

As you know R.{Sir Henry Royce} has not accepted the 20HP. type carrier on EAC. 10.

Recently you sent a report criticising the standard Phantom type on the ground of lack of rigidity, and inaccessibility of the handle for tightening up purposes.

As we shall have to go into this whole question with R.{Sir Henry Royce} probably as soon as he comes back, we should be very much obliged if you would confirm either your previous report, or let us have any further remarks you may wish to make.

It will be remembered that when we were in Derby it was arranged to increase the thickness of the body rail tube with a view to increasing the rigidity.
We should be glad to know whether any good was done by this.

DA.{Bernard Day - Chassis Design}
  
  


Copyright Sustain 2025, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙