Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).
Comparison report between the R.R. and the Luvax Bijur pumps.

Identifier  ExFiles\Box 141\2\  scan0061
Date  10th January 1934
  
COPY

To E.{Mr Elliott - Chief Engineer} from Hs{Lord Ernest Hives - Chair}/GWH.{George W. Hancock - Head Chateauroux}
c. to Da.{Bernard Day - Chassis Design}
c. to By.{R.W. Bailey - Chief Engineer}
c. to Wor.{Arthur Wormald - General Works Manager}
c. to Sft.{Mr Swift}

Report on the Comparisons of the R.R.
and the Luvax Bijur Pumps.
---------------------------
The following are the particulars of the two Pumps :-

WEIGHT
R.R. Luvax.
6 lbs. 4 lbs. 11 ozs.

CAPACITY.
25.5 c.c. 16.3 c.c.

LAG IN PUMP LEVER AFTER PEDAL IS DEPRESSED.
None. 1.00".

With regard to this lag in the pedal movement, the Luvax people claim that with their valve it is impossible to pump air into the pipe lines when the pump is empty. With the R.R. pump it is possible to do this with the result that the pipe lines become filled with air which prevents oil flowing to various sections of the car. With the Luvax Pump it is more necessary to release the pedal quickly; otherwise the pump chamber will not fill up with oil.

POUNDS PRESSURE - TAKEN WITH A SMALL LEAK.
R.R. Luvax.
67 lbs/sq.in. At start of stoke 85 lbs/sq.in.
62 " " At three quarters 74 " "
of stroke

PRESSURE MAINTAINED WITH NO OUTLET FROM PUMP.
70 lbs/sq.in. 120 lbs/sq.in.

Cont'd.{John DeLooze - Company Secretary}
  
  


Copyright Sustain 2025, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙