Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).
Design and testing of a new scheme for luggage grids and spare wheel carriers on the 20/25 model.

Identifier  ExFiles\Box 103\5\  scan0102
Date  17th December 1930
  
COPY. X5600

To BY.{R.W. Bailey - Chief Engineer} From Sg.{Arthur F. Sidgreaves - MD} re 20/25. Luggage Sg{Arthur F. Sidgreaves - MD}15/E17.12.30.
C. to Wor.{Arthur Wormald - General Works Manager} Hs.{Lord Ernest Hives - Chair} Cx.{Major Len W. Cox - Advertising Manager} Grids & Wheel Carriers.

X.5400.
X.5600.

Referring to Da{Bernard Day - Chassis Design}/Ev{Ivan Evernden - coachwork}1/M12.12.30 when we looked at 18-G-4 at W. we were struck by the fact that the appearance of the car was spoilt by the large spare wheel carrier on the near side which has to be there on all 20/25's which have a luggage grid because, in order to use the luggage grid, the spare wheel has to be dismounted from the back and fitted to the side.

A second disadvantage of this scheme is that in very many cases, once this has been done, the chauffeur or owner does not trouble to put it back at the rear of the car.

This is a state of affairs which has existed far too long and I took the matter up woth WW with a view to having an arrangement which was at least as good as that now on the Phantom ll whereby you can use the luggage grid without disturbing the wheel.

I am very anxious that this new scheme should be completed and tested in order to enable it to be incorporated in the next batch of material which we have to sanction, as it would be regrettable if we had to order more for the same arrangement as at present.

I understand that the two schemes outlined in the Da{Bernard Day - Chassis Design}/Ev{Ivan Evernden - coachwork} memo. quoted are approximately 90% the same and that the grid uses many of the existing P.ll parts so that in the long run economy from a production point of view should be effected.

I should like to see prints of both the N.Sch. 3184 and N.Sch.3185.

From the recent memo. from Hs{Lord Ernest Hives - Chair}/Rm.{William Robotham - Chief Engineer} in connection with the 10,000 mile test of 18-G4 I gathered that the parts for this revised scheme cannot be completed in time to enable them to be tested on this car but that it is proposed to send another 20/25 for a 10,000 mile test very shortly with this and certain other features which were detailed in the Hs{Lord Ernest Hives - Chair}/Rm.{William Robotham - Chief Engineer}memo referred to.

I should like to hear that you do not anticipate any great difficulty in carrying out the above.

Sg.{Arthur F. Sidgreaves - MD}
  
  


Copyright Sustain 2025, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙