Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).
The cooling tests of a Cadillac V-16 car, comparing its performance to the Phantom III.

Identifier  ExFiles\Box 155\1\  scan0236
Date  24th June 1936
  
X1320

To R.{Sir Henry Royce}
c. to Nor.
c. to V.{VIENNA}
c. to MX.{John H Maddocks - Chief Proving Officer}

HS{Lord Ernest Hives - Chair}/Std.3/JH. 24.6.36.

Report on Cooling Tests on Cadillac V-16
car at Brooklands - June 18th 1936.

This car was taken to the track in order to
judge its cooling in comparison with the Ph.III car.

The tests were carried out in a similar
manner to those in recent report, and the critical
air temperatures etc. under high speed and low speed
full throttle conditions are shown on attached
sheet, compared with the corresponding Ph.III ones.

Conclusions.

(1) The Cadillac car is very much better cooled
than the Ph.III

(2) This superiority in cooling is obtained in two
ways.

(a) By a very effective fan. This is deduced
since fitting the fan to the Cadillac
raises its critical air temp. at 40 M.P.H.
from 19°C to 40°C, and at 38 M.P.H. from
29°C to 49°C, whereas the Ph.III fan only
raises the critical air temp. at 40 M.P.H.
from 20°C to 28.5°C. (see last report on Ph.III
cooling).

(b) By means of the cowling in front of the
radiator, which improves the air flow through
the core, particularly at high speeds.
This is deduced since the Cadillac car
(whose matrix is of same volume as, and of
smaller frontal area than, the Cadillac
matrix) is better cooled at high speeds than
the Ph.III car, both without fans fitted.
  
  


Copyright Sustain 2025, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙