Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

Letter declining a battery sample from Alklum Storage Batteries Ltd. due to high cost and performance requirements.


Identifier  ExFiles\Box 164\3\  img005
Date  9th February 1937
  
6422

Experimental Department

Rm {William Robotham - Chief Engineer} /Wst.10/AP.

9th February 1937.

Alklum Storage Batteries Ltd.,
Waterside,
HALIFAX.

Dear Sirs,

We beg to thank you for your letter of the 8th inst., reference Sales/TLB/DH {D. Henderson - Showroom} /RO. {C. C. Rose - Export Manager} , but regret that we do not consider it to our advantage for you to proceed to make up for us any sample batteries for test, as we understand the cost of such a battery, giving the same capacity and performance as our standard lead acid type, would be approximately six or seven times the cost of our standard battery.

Therefore, for your battery to be considered, it would have to give us at least seven times the life of our standard battery i.e. 21 years, which we think you will agree is rather out of the question.

In order to compete with our standard battery you must be able to give us the same capacity for approximately the same weight and at a cost which will justify the outlay.

Yours faithfully,

FOR ROLLS-ROYCE LTD.
  
  
From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).


Copyright Sustain 2026, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙