P. & R. battery, favouring weight reduction over increased capacity.
| Identifier | ExFiles\Box 38\5\ Scan275 | |
| Date | 10th November 1922 | |
| X3398 TO Mr.C. & F.H. from R. {Sir Henry Royce} C. to Mr. Ev. {Ivan Evernden - coachwork} Hy. {Tom Haldenby - Plant Engineer} EP. {G. Eric Platford - Chief Quality Engineer} Hs. {Lord Ernest Hives - Chair} R2/10.11.22. P. & R. {Sir Henry Royce} BATTERY. It is understood between us, including Mr. Day that we have no objection whatever to the P.&.R. battery, in fact we favour it, but we do not think it is wise to start with a battery of increased capa- city, but rather let us save some percentage of the weight and make it of the same capacity as we are at present using. I have pointed out from time to time that I am sure it is a question of increased reliability of the battery, combined with a dynamo which cuts in sufficiently low, and an easy means for charging at the garage. R. {Sir Henry Royce} [STAMP: RECEIVED NOV 10 1922] | ||
From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).