From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).
Suspension issues on a 20HP model after a 10,000-mile test and recommending proprietary hydraulic shock dampers.
Identifier | WestWitteringFiles\O\April1926-June1926\ Scan46 | |
Date | 22th April 1926 | |
R.R. 235A (100 T) (S.H. 159 11-8-20) G.{Mr Griffiths - Chief Accountant / Mr Gnapp} 2800 HS.{Lord Ernest Hives - Chair} } TO BA. } FROM R.{Sir Henry Royce} BY.{R.W. Bailey - Chief Engineer} } (Le CanadelHenry Royce's French residence.) ORIGINAL R1/M22.4.26. Rec'd at WW. evening of 26.4.26. C.c. to BJ. WOR.{Arthur Wormald - General Works Manager} RG.{Mr Rowledge} " CY. NA.{Mr Nadin} " Mr.Claremont " Mr.Fuller SUSPENSION - 10.G.111. 20HP. DOING 10,000 MILES. X5410 X235 Y5840a In agreement with reports while driving this car here I also thought it was too lightly sprung at the back for France, and shock dampers were not effective enough. This is exactly the same conclusion we always come to - stiffer springs and more effective shock dampers for France than for England and USA. The best solution known to us at present is RR. hydraulic shock dampers on both axles of both models. Work hard and constantly until these are correctly adapted to each. I say RR. because Lovejoy are only one way, and cannot be effective enough without other defects, and they have not forced filling during suction. Are our patents sufficient and good, and all we can do? [Stamp: RECEIVED 28 APR 1926 R.{Sir Henry Royce}] | ||