Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

Letter to M. Olley of Cadillac discussing rear-engined cars, specifically the Burney and a Beverley Barnes straight 8 power unit.


Identifier  ExFiles\Box 170\2\  img121
Date  12th December 1931
  
Hs {Lord Ernest Hives - Chair} /Rm. {William Robotham - Chief Engineer} 1/AD.

December 12th, 1931.

M. {Mr Moon / Mr Moore} Olley Esq.
Cadillac Motor Car Co.
Detroit,
Michigan, U.S.A.

Dear Oy,

Thank you for your informative letter.
I shall hope to pick up information fully on these points when I come over.

I can at least tell you something about rear engined motor cars. The only one of any consequence at the moment in England is the Burney. This is not a motor car constructed in the back yard of Bowden cables and scrap iron but a well thought out job with first class coachwork costing about £3,000 per car to build.

The one I have tried was one of the first they made and it had a Beverley Barnes straight 8 power unit with two overhead camshafts. We think you will agree that one would consider this type of unit to be most unsuitable for a luxury motor car if it was fitted in the conventional position. It had a little short exhaust silencer about 2' long x 5" dia. The drive was by worm. The wheels were independently sprung - the makers knowing little or nothing about correct spring deflection had guessed at apparently about 4" front and rear, and not fitted any shock absorbers. I thought the attributes of the car in order of merit were :-
  
  
From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).


Copyright Sustain 2026, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙