Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

Scuttle separation on 40/50 HP bodies, referencing a Coachbuilders sub-committee meeting and blueprint No.703B.


Identifier  ExFiles\Box 171\3\  img185
Date  25th June 1923
  
COPY.

S/W. {Sales / Derby Works}

Hn {F. C. Honeyman - Retail orders} 12/MH {M. Huckerby} 25.6.23.

RE SCUTTLE SEPARATION.
BY4/P13.6.23.

I give you below an extract from the minutes of the meeting of the Coachbuilders sub-committee, held on the 21th inst., at which were present.LHS. {Lord Herbert Scott - Chair} (in the Chair) OG. HO. & Hn. {F. C. Honeyman - Retail orders}

"BY4/P13623 was read. This approves of the suggestion to omit the semi-flexible scuttle attachment scheme on 40/50 H.P. Bodies. BY. {R.W. Bailey - Chief Engineer} is to be asked for the immediate omission of the old scheme from chassis prints; to shew in its place a suggested seperation arrangement. A copy of Barkers blueprint No.703B, shewing the arrangement to be adopted on the new cars for LHS {Lord Herbert Scott - Chair} , and Lord Wargrave is to be sent to BY, and it is to be suggested to him that a similar scheme should be shewn upon future chassis prints unless he knows of a better arrangement. At the same time BY. {R.W. Bailey - Chief Engineer} is to be asked whether he sees any reason why the aluminium strip shewn on Barkers blueprint should not have the upward slant reduced as, in the opinion of the sub-committee, this would improve the appearance".

I attach blueprint No.703B, and shall be glad to receive your replies to the suggestions made by the C.S.C. as early as possible.

C/Hn. {F. C. Honeyman - Retail orders}
  
  
From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).


Copyright Sustain 2026, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙