Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).
Comparative test report on suspension performance for the Phantom and 20 HP models.

Identifier  WestWitteringFiles\O\2April1926-June1926\  Scan016
Date  7th April 1926 guessed
  
PHANTOM.
20 TO 30 M.P.H. ON A SLIGHTLY WAVY MAIN ROAD.

Front shock dampers tightened from 25 to 100 lbs. | Definitely worse riding in the back of the car.
Rear shock dampers - ditto. | Much the same result - effect slightly worse if anything.
No shock dampers. | Best condition for the particular fault complained of.
Weaker front springs. | Improvement - relative value not yet decided.
Increasing mass over front axle 20% | No measureable improvement.
Hydraulic shock dampers 25 and 75 lbs. | Better riding than equivalent friction dampers.

20 HP.

Front shock absorbers tightened from 25 to 100 lbs. | Worse riding in the back of the car.
Rear shock dampers - ditto. | Ditto.
No shock dampers. | Best condition for fault complained of - better than Phantom.
Hydraulic shock dampers - 25 and 75 lbs. | Better riding than equivalent friction shock dampers.

HS{Lord Ernest Hives - Chair}/W.A.Robotham.
  
  


Copyright Sustain 2025, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙