Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).
Letter regarding a dynamo charge system fault on a Phantom II car, discussing regulator issues and noise suppression methods.

Identifier  ExFiles\Box 168a\3\  img286
Date  24th February 1936
  
c. to H.{Arthur M. Hanbury - Head Complaints}
c. to Hd{Mr Hayward/Mr Huddy}/SB.{Mr Bull/Mr Bannister}
c. to N.

86142

HA/Wat.l/WA.{Mr Wallis} 24th February, 1936.

Mr. W.S. Verralls,
Messrs. E.K. Cole, Ltd.,
Ekco Works,
SOUTHEND-ON-SEA.

Dear Mr. Verralls,

Our Service Dept., has informed me
of the trouble you have been experiencing with the
dynamo charge system on your Phantom II car 163-TA.

Personally, from the written evidence
available, I am of the opinion that the regulator is
faulty caused initially by the fitting, if only for
a short time, of a condenser noise suppressor to the
dynamo field circuit.

I have been in touch with your Mr. R.I. Cowley,
who I have met at your Works, on this very question as
we have definitely established the fact that the regulator
will fail or become erratic if any capacitance is
inserted anywhere in the field circuit in such a way as to be
virtually connected across the first pair of regulator
contacts.

The only method of noise suppression we
recognise is to connect a 1 micro farad condenser to the
main positive terminal of the dynamo and to use a metal
braided earthed screened lead between the dynamo field
terminal and the regulator and possibly also from the
dynamo field fuse to the regulator, it is largely a
matter of experiment with each car.
  
  


Copyright Sustain 2025, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙