Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

Expressing opinions on car body design, specifically avoiding heavy, top-heavy, and cramped bodies.


Identifier  WestWitteringFiles\N\October1925-December1925\  Scan62
Date  27th October 1925
  
TO CJ. FROM R. {Sir Henry Royce}
C. to HA.
BY. {R.W. Bailey - Chief Engineer} HS. {Lord Ernest Hives - Chair}

ORIGINAL

R3/M27.10.25.

re. BODIES. X 8830 / X5870

I am sometimes misunderstood on the question of bodies.

I cannot say that I am a good critic of what ought to be made, but I do think we should use every endeavour to avoid very heavy, and especially top heavy bodies.

I do not like cramped bodies for our 40/50. or even for our 20HP., especially in the matter of width at the front seat, and I do dislike the practice of waste of space and weight, as I have seen many times even lately.

I am not blaming RR. for these shortcomings, but I think we ought to use our influence to keep them as near right as possible.

Windovers have fitted to the India(Production 20 HP. with 4-speed box and Front Wheel Brakes) a simple scheme of runningboard tool box, light, inexpensive, and efficient, and vastly different to some I complained of some months ago which were heavy, and putrid with fungus.

R. {Sir Henry Royce}

RECEIVED 28 OCT 1925
  
  
From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).


Copyright Sustain 2026, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙