Rolls-Royce Archives
         « Prev  Box Series  Next »        

Letter to C.C. Wakefield & Co. Ltd. regarding the unsuitability of Castrol 'R' oil for hypoid rear axles.


Identifier  ExFiles\Box 32\3\  Scan165
Date  19th July 1929
  
X1583

Expl. Dept.

HS {Lord Ernest Hives - Chair} 2/MJ.
July 19th.1929.

Messrs. C. C. Wakefield & Co.Ltd.,
Wakefield House,
30-32, Cheapside,
London E.C.2.
X1583
X2066

Dear Sir,

For the attention of MR.Limb.

Some time ago we took up with you the
question of satisfactory oil for hypoid rear axles.

You will remember you sent some oil to
the Gleason Co., and we forwarded to you their report
in which they stated that they found Castrol'R' not as
good as Whitmore's oil they recommended. In spite of
their report, we have tried a few axles on Castrol 'R' and
have had cases of failure when using this oil which have
never occurred when using Whitmore's.

We are therefore issuing instructions
that Whitmore's oil must be used for our rear axles until
we have proved a satisfactory alternative.

We should like to know whether you have
acted upon the report which we sent to you from the Gleason
Co., and also whether you have any alternative oil to re-
commend for this particular job.

Yours faithfully,
  
  
From the Rolls-Royce experimental archive: a quarter of a million communications from Rolls-Royce, 1906 to 1960's. Documents from the Sir Henry Royce Memorial Foundation (SHRMF).


Copyright Sustain 2026, All Rights Reserved.    whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙